captureRows.ts builds Java's rows per frame (Lauscher.datenVorbereiten):
Ethernet; ARP, ICMP or IP; TCP or UDP; the data with Java's protocol
recognition; with addresses and ports or ports only. The comment stays
structured; captureCommentText says it with given words and numbers.
ScenarioNetwork writes Java's finished tables per card (Lauscher.getDaten,
German locale); all runtime runs are recorded again, NatRun has ttlOut.
expectSameCaptures compares both views for every frame. Fixed where the
engine differed: an ARP request's target MAC is the broadcast address,
an ICMP error's identifier and sequence number are 0 (RFC 792), and host
unreachable from a router carries the packet as forwarded. Not taken:
Java's lower-case broadcast address in a reply to 0.0.0.0, and the typo
'Exeeded'. RIP keeps its recordings: Java's staggered router start now
gives a different startup on this machine.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The engine keeps Java's packet capture (capture.ts): per network card
every frame it sent (when it leaves on the cable) or received (also one
for another card), once, with time and number; switches log nothing;
frames the packet loss dropped are kept apart; the capture outlives a
stop and a new start, as in Java, until clearCapture. Per port instead
of per MAC, at most 10,000 frames a card.
expectSameCaptures compares each card's capture with Java's list of that
card in the ARP, WLAN, DNS, TCP, NAT, RIP and single-client DHCP runs.
It found that ScenarioNetwork ignored a switch's learning time (Java ran
300 s, the core the scenarios' 5 s); the oracle sets it now, and the TCP
and DHCP runs are recorded again. A core test found that a new start
numbers frames from 1 again and the capture took them as seen.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every packet that comes in goes through its node's IP thread (UDP, TCP) or
ICMP thread (ICMP), as Java's IPThread and ICMPThread: deliver, answer an
echo request or forward, one after the other; while one waits for ARP, the
next wait behind it. A packet a node sends to itself is delivered at once,
as Java's IP.senden does. The transport send threads and these are one
mechanism now (handToProtocolThread).
ArpRun has three stories through the router (routedUdpBehind,
routedPingBesideUdp, routedPingBehindPing); the oracle writes ICMP frames
with type, code, addresses and sequence number. All seven ArpRun stories
match Java FILIUS.
Measured and not taken: Java's ARP wakes one waiter with notify, not the
one whose answer came; the core wakes all that wait for the address.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An ARP lookup asks, waits a round trip, asks once more and gives up after
another round trip; then host unreachable, observed at the sender itself or
sent back by the router (for ICMP only for an echo request). A waiting
sender wakes after what else happens at that time. A ping then waits a
round trip for its answer, counted from when it left. Swift asks twice at
once while events run and lets the packet wait without end when the
address exists anywhere in the network; the option swiftArp keeps that for
the Swift comparison, and three scenarios are compared with Swift until the
trace where ARP fails or a ping goes unanswered.
arpJava.test.ts compares ArpRun: both pings match; the two UDP stories wait
for Java's transport thread (next step). DNS without a server now matches
Java too.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Java's SimplexVerbindung sleeps a cable's delay with the port's buffer
locked: frames on one cable leave one after the other, and a frame shows
in the packet log when it leaves. The engine now queues a frame in the
output buffer until the one before has arrived (ethernetLinkDeparture).
Swift sends a cable's frames at once; the option swiftCables keeps that for
the Swift comparison, which goes on checking everything else trace by
trace.
With the queue, the Java comparisons match within 120 ms (was 200); a
state of the TCP stories within 250 ms, where the engine's calls block
one after the other.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
TCP follows Java's TCPSocket where it differs from Swift: each attempt and
TIME_WAIT wait three round trips that follow the speed (8250 ms at 90 %),
counted from when the segment is handed down, before ARP; the next segment
ends TIME_WAIT; the other end closes by itself on FIN; data no one
acknowledges closes with FIN; the accepted socket has the listener's
initial sequence number, and the listener takes the next.
Not taken from Java: three SYNs, not one (Java's retry loop ends after
the first timeout), named in tcpJava.test.ts as JAVA_BUGS.
tcpJava.test.ts compares TcpRun's three stories frame by frame and state
by state; the Swift comparison only checks that the TCP scenarios differ.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
julian.kiedaischandClaude Opus 5.5