engine.ts ports Swift's "DHCP server and automatic client": an active
server listens on port 67 from the start and offers a static assignment
before its range, round from the address after the last one offered;
offers last 10 s, dynamic leases a day, and a server whose offer another
server beat blacklists that address for a while. A client starts as an
event: DISCOVER, OFFER, a check by ARP, DECLINE, REQUEST, ACK or NAK,
2.5 s per wait, and after ten failures its old address back. The snapshot
carries the DHCP settings of clients and servers.
Four scenarios match the Swift engine. One Swift error is named in the
oracle test: a client run directly is advanced a second time, to FINISH,
by the server's answer within its own DISCOVER, and the outer run then
writes back its stale copy of the status (Swift's value types); the
address and every trace agree, only the reported status is wrong in
Swift. Swift's three DHCP engine tests are ported, with tests for
stopping and the message format. 15 mutation probes, 14 caught; the other
concerns the home router, which runs only once NAT is ported.
Two departures from Java remain, to be fixed next: from the event queue
the client's ARP check does not wait, so an address conflict is never
found, and each answer that wakes the client makes it send its state's
message again (a second DISCOVER and REQUEST, the second answered with
NAK). Java waits a round trip and sends once per attempt.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
engine.ts ports Swift's "Java-compatible TCP sockets" in one piece, since
half a state machine could not be checked: server and client sockets (a
free port from Java's random numbers on their own seed), the three-way
handshake with its result (connected, invalid socket, unreachable, timed
out), segments of 1460 bytes, messages up to the push, a timeout of
3 × 2.5 s with at most three attempts, closing through every Java state
including TIME_WAIT (2.5 s), sequence numbers modulo 2^32.
Three scenarios match the Swift engine trace for trace: a LAN with data
over three segments, closing from both ends, a closed port and an
unreachable host; two networks through a router with a firewall rule,
data lost until the connection closes, and an accepted socket that does
not hold the port of its closed listener; CLOSING, reached by a lost FIN.
The engine delivers a FIN within the same close, so both ends close at
once only with packet loss; an empty message does not arrive in Swift (it
does not advance the sequence number), nor here.
Swift's four TCP engine tests are ported, with tests for stopping, a
foreign SYN+ACK at a listener and the flag names. 17 mutation probes, 16
caught; the other (delivered, not waited, not connected gives unreachable)
cannot be reached through Swift's engine, which never sends a reset and
always acknowledges correctly.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
engine.ts ports the UDP part of Swift's "UDP sockets and Router RIP": a
socket bound to a given port or to a free one drawn from 49152–65534 with
Java's random numbers on Swift's seed; sending, also as a limited broadcast
on every interface (or the bound one) with TTL 1; delivery into the queue
of every socket on the destination port, which then answers to the last
sender; receiving, with a timeout that advances the virtual clock; closing.
Stopping forgets sockets and queues. RIP stays not ported; Swift's DHCP
handling of a datagram has nothing to do until DHCP is in the snapshot.
The oracle gets the steps bindUdp, sendUdp, receiveUdp and closeSocket on
both sides and reports the sockets. Two new scenarios — a LAN, and two
networks through a router with a UDP firewall rule and a broadcast that
does not cross it — match the Swift engine trace for trace, the random
ports included. Swift's four UDP engine tests are ported, with a test for
stopping. 11 mutation probes were all caught (one only after the stop test
was added).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
tools/swift-oracle builds the unchanged Swift runtime (pinned 3b5ded0)
in Docker and replays JSON scenarios; the TypeScript engine must produce
the same trace events, results and end state. Five scenarios, 884
events, identical.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
julian.kiedaischandClaude Opus 5.5